The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Walsall20+1139
2Notts County20+1337
3Swindon20+937

4Bromley20+936
5MK Dons20+1433
6Salford20033
7Chesterfield20+532

8Crewe20+631
9Cambridge Utd20+431
10Gillingham20+630
11Fleetwood Town20+330
12Colchester20+628
13Barnet20+528
14Grimsby20+527
15Tranmere20+326
16Oldham20+224
17Accrington Stanley20024
18Barrow20-821
19Cheltenham20-1721
20Shrewsbury20-1319
21Crawley Town20-1018
22Harrogate Town20-1317

23Bristol Rovers20-2317
24Newport County20-1713

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Where will Grimsby finish?





 

Prudent Management or Plain Lunacy?

By: Graham Howes
Date: 24/01/2002

EVERY year we have same problem around this period. A number of players have contracts that run out at the end of the current campaign. The board have indicated they cannot negotiate due to the fact we do not know what division we will be playing in.

Home > Features > Prudent Management or Plain Lunacy?


However is this prudent management or plain lunacy? I will explain. I believe one player who is due is Alan Pouton - if not let's use him as an example. [Ed - he has actually signed a new contract]. On today's current market he is worth £750K. If he does not start negotiations he is free to approach other clubs. Come near transfer deadline there may be every indication that he may sign for someone else on a Bosman. The club then will have to start listening to offers around £200K. You may think this is pie in the sky yet this very thing happened with Jack Lester a few seasons ago. We also lost Peter Handyside to a Bosman last season. We must have lost financially a combined £500-600K in revenue from the Lester and Handyside fiasco. We also could lose another £500K on Pouton, effectively 1 million pounds loss to a club like Grimsby is suicide.

Let's assume he is on £3K a week, he costs the club £156K a year in wages. What you can do is get the player to sign for two more years. If the worst happens he can then be made available. You have a safety net so that any prospective buyers want him they pay full market value. It may take a month or so for him to be sold, but you still will make a profit return compared to the other solution of Bosmans or a cheap sale. Admittedly you do not do this with every squad member due. It is no good doing this with a player whose value is less than £150K.

So I pose the question again is it prudent management or plain lunacy to play the waiting game when contracts are up in the summer? In my opinion if the player is an asset in value to the club it is plain lunacy. We currently losing money, so any decision that costs the club much needed finances is a wrong move. You may save £50K in wages in the short term and get a £200K sale. Yet holding on a little while could net £600-700K. Even if you consider a £100K signing-on sweetener you still are better off trying to get the player tied up.


If you have a rant or two and you would also like the opportunity to air your views and opinions, Click here to submit them!



Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Michael Jolley66Hagrid15/12 10:06
No surprises ……..6Abdul1915/12 09:21
DA interview 70gtfc_chris15/12 09:04
Bromley away38rancido15/12 08:27
Summer Recruitment58rancido15/12 08:17
Pym179Darkside of The Humber15/12 06:25
TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures3SiteBot15/12 03:30
Walking down the Grimsby Road....22DB15/12 01:53
Just back (merged)145jamesgtfc14/12 17:38

This Season and previous Seasons