The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC



League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Port Vale17+834
2Walsall16+1331
3Crewe16+629

4Doncaster17+429
5Notts County17+828
6MK Dons16+827
7AFC Wimbledon16+1126

8Chesterfield17+1025
9Grimsby17-725
10Bradford16+423
11Gillingham16+323
12Barrow17+122
13Fleetwood Town14+521
14Cheltenham17-321
15Salford16-321
16Newport County17-721
17Harrogate Town17-721
18Accrington Stanley16-418
19Bromley16-217
20Colchester16-317
21Tranmere16-1017
22Swindon17-813

23Morecambe17-1213
24Carlisle17-1513

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

Follow the Fishy on Twitter
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Is football a business or a sport?




 

League Slammed Over Rule Change Proposal

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 26/04/2003

R3, The trade body representing the business recovery specialists who pick up the pieces when football clubs get into financial difficulty today slammed football league proposals.

The proposals, announced yesterday, mean any club entering into an insolvency procedure could be docked points or possibly even relegated, possibly leading to the loss of some of the UK's most historic clubs.

R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals believes the football league has missed the point completely. Following Leicester City's promotion after administration this season, the league seems to be of the view that a club enters into an insolvency procedure to renege on their debts and gain an advantage over its rivals.

An R3 spokesperson said "This over simplifies the true commercial risks facing football clubs - the plain fact of the matter is that financially stricken clubs are forced into administration due to their legal duty to creditors and to avoid prosecution of the directors for knowingly trading while insolvent.

The bottom line is that for many clubs administration is the last resort, not a way of duping the people they owe money to.

What these proposed sanctions are more likely to do is encourage many clubs to trade for longer while insolvent due to a fear of lost points or relegation, and in the long term, as the debts pile up, the main loser will be the creditors who will get paid less as there will be less to go round as losses continue to mount. Stoking up a fear of insolvency is not the answer.

Furthermore, sanctions imposed by the league are likely to damage a club's season. Revenues will go down as fans desert, players will be less motivated and consequently, a competitive advantage will be handed to those clubs who have yet to be played.

The problem lies with inflated wages. A club's biggest overhead is its players' wages. In 2001, these accounted for 105% of the total revenue of the First division alone, and this was before the collapse of ITV Digital which cost each division club £2.5million.

The football league should take action to release clubs form the restrictive super creditor rule which puts a club's players at the top of the pile in terms of who gets paid first in insolvency. It also states that if a club does not pay its players the full amount they are owed in wages then that club faces expulsion from the league.

However, if clubs were able to negotiate with players and alter the amount they were paid according to income levels in order to shake off overheads, reduce arrears and pay creditors, then insolvency would be far less likely. This is what a business recovery specialist would seek to do in any other industry as a mechanism of saving the business. With football clubs, the super-creditor rule prevents them from doing this. R3 believes the answer lies in its abolition.

If sanctions are to be imposed, then they should come at an earlier stage. If clubs do not pay their PAYE consecutively for two months, then they could be docked a point. This would encourage better cash flow management at an earlier stage, not after the final nail has been put into the coffin.

R3 believes these proposals to be bad news for everyday creditors who will get paid less as clubs delay entering into an insolvency procedure, bad news for the clubs themselves because a relegated club is unlikely to attract potentially lifesaving investment and finally bad news for players, as it will inevitably lead to salaries being slashed when they are up for renewal. In short, a measure that is meant to be preventative could lead to the loss of many historic football league clubs."END




Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Just Back239Son of Cod27/11 08:17
JANUARY TRANSFER WINDOW 98HertsGTFC27/11 08:13
Article in The Independent 51Son of Cod27/11 08:06
Swindon  Appoint Holloway177forza ivano27/11 07:33
TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures3SiteBot27/11 03:30
Lincoln City 731Limerick Mariner26/11 21:27
Enter your Colchester Player Ratings3friskneymariner26/11 19:34
Mariners tv8Ashby mariner26/11 17:19
Vale v Crewe10GrimRob26/11 15:49
Match Thread Colchester Home146Poojah26/11 11:05