|
|
League Two Form Guide
| P | GD | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MK Dons | 6 | +7 | 15 |
| 2 | Port Vale | 6 | +4 | 13 |
| 3 | Walsall | 6 | +6 | 12 |
| 4 | Crewe | 6 | +5 | 12 |
| 5 | Cheltenham | 6 | +2 | 11 |
| 6 | Chesterfield | 6 | +3 | 10 |
| 7 | Accrington Stanley | 6 | +3 | 9 |
| 8 | Salford | 6 | +1 | 9 |
| 9 | Doncaster | 6 | +1 | 9 |
| 10 | Notts County | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 11 | Bradford | 6 | +1 | 8 |
| 12 | AFC Wimbledon | 6 | +1 | 7 |
| 13 | Bromley | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 14 | Harrogate Town | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 15 | Grimsby | 6 | -4 | 7 |
| 16 | Colchester | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 17 | Carlisle | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 18 | Fleetwood Town | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 19 | Newport County | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 20 | Tranmere | 6 | -4 | 6 |
| 21 | Morecambe | 6 | -7 | 6 |
| 22 | Gillingham | 6 | -4 | 4 |
| 23 | Barrow | 6 | -4 | 3 |
| 24 | Swindon | 6 | -5 | 2 |
Full Form Table
Prem|Champ|L1|NL|VN|VS
SPL|SC|S1|S2
Latest Results (all divisions)
A Gypsy's Warning! - Or Is It All Porkies?
By: Bill Osborne
Date: 21/06/2003
PETER Furneaux warned today that Danny Coyne may not be a first choice selection next season if he fails in his bid to leave Blundell Park saying : "We only want players whose heart is in the club."
The Grimsby Telegraph report quotes Furneaux as saying: "It has been reported that he may look to his future away from GTFC. This is something he is doing, it has not come from us".
"We have not tried to get rid of him. He is under contract and we are paying him right through the summer at the rate he got in Division One and we will continue to pay him while he talks to other clubs".
"We have to look after our own interests. Should he not get a new club, it may be he will not be an automatic choice in every game". END
It seems likely that pressure is being put on Coyne to find another club. His cost to Town is high and despite the statements that 'we are not pushing him out', the club have placed him on the free transfer list, which is a good enough sign to me..
Coyne wants to get away. It is just a case of finding someone who wants him and at what price. He will not be looking to take on the sort of wages Town are currently offering no matter who makes the offer.
So unless a better offer is made from either a first division or premier league club, we can expect to see him serving out his contract at Blundell Park, and despite the chairman's warning, if he is the best we have got, he will play. So I cannot see the point of the statement except to try convince everyone that the club are not forcing him out.
I doubt if they will convince anyone - but who cares? Coyne wants to go, they want him to go, everyone therefore should be happy!
Or is that too simple?
This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!
Related Stories
| Thread Title | Posts | Latest Post | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TV Games/Upcoming Fixtures | 3 | SiteBot | 27/11 03:30 |
| Swindon Appoint Holloway | 176 | ex-merseymariner | 27/11 00:17 |
| Article in The Independent | 50 | kevikov | 26/11 22:18 |
| Lincoln City | 731 | Limerick Mariner | 26/11 21:27 |
| JANUARY TRANSFER WINDOW | 96 | Alan Buckley | 26/11 20:51 |
| Enter your Colchester Player Ratings | 3 | friskneymariner | 26/11 19:34 |
| Mariners tv | 8 | Ashby mariner | 26/11 17:19 |
| Just Back | 238 | Mappers | 26/11 16:49 |
| Vale v Crewe | 10 | GrimRob | 26/11 15:49 |
| Match Thread Colchester Home | 146 | Poojah | 26/11 11:05 |