The Fishy - Grimsby Town FC

League Two Table

  PGDPts
1Salford14+1031
2Barnet13+1026
3Walsall13+922

4Crewe14022
5Cheltenham14-221
6Grimsby14+620
7York14+320

8Gillingham14+120
9Accrington Stanley14+619
10Chesterfield14+319
11Tranmere14+219
12Exeter14+219
13Swindon14-219
14Newport County14+318
15Shrewsbury14-518
16Fleetwood Town14017
17Bristol Rovers14-616
18Port Vale12-415
19Rochdale14-915
20Northampton12014
21Oldham13-512
22Rotherham14-712

23Colchester13-712
24Crawley Town12-89

Full League Two Table
Prem|Champ|L1|L2|NL|NLN|NLS
SPL|SC|S1|S2

The Fishy on XThe Fishy on Bluesky
NewsNow logo

Question of the Week

Are Grimsby more likely to get...




His Honour
His Honour

Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting For The Cash!

By: Bill Osborne
Date: 13/06/2005

IN the club statement regarding the legal action against the Hammonds solicitors group, the club issues a warning that we should not get carried away by the announcement as litigation can go either way.

One can be assured that the legal representatives of the insurance companies of Hammonds will try every trick in the book to defend their clients, as it is the insurance company or companies that will eventually pay out if the League wins.

One of the main issues to be resolved is the question of liability of the contract acceptance.

The defence will plead, according to the advice I have been given that: "The solicitors only offered advice and it was up to the League to either accept or not the advice given. The League decided to accept the advice and acted upon it. In short, the League signed the contract which was the cause of the financial losses sustained by the clubs due to no guarantees being obtained from the parent companies of ITV Digital. Therefore the League are responsible, not the solicitors."

Now that seems straight enough to me but fortunately or unfortunately, as the case may be, the law is much more complicated than that and it is not as clear cut as it appears.

In any case, we may not see any decision before we pay the outstanding tax bill, so that is another reason we should not get carried away.

I personally have been through the courts in a compensation case and my view is that if during the course of events an out of court settlement is offered, providing the offer is reasonable, the League should accept it rather than risking losing the whole lot.

Better to have half a loaf than none at all.

Mind you, if the case collapses and we get nothing, we can always sue the League for failing to protect us. Didn't one club suggest doing that just after the ITV Digital collapse?

Whatever happens, the Football League has learned a very expensive lesson.

Always read the small print before you sign! Everybody knows that.

Except the Football League perhaps.

Add To Facebook


This site is by the fans, for the fans, and we will consider articles on any subject relating to the Mariners whether it be related to current news, a nostalgic look back in the past, a story about a player, a game or games in the past, something about Blundell Park or football in general. Click here to submit your article!


Related Stories


Forum Latest
Thread TitlePostsLatest Post
Just Back York56GrimExile31/10 18:48
Trouble at Boston29Lost in Lincoln31/10 18:46
Fa cup3LH31/10 18:44
Nigel lowther9Hagrid31/10 18:40
6th4BirtlesHatTrick31/10 18:33
top crowds of last 10 years3IlkleyMariner31/10 17:56
Iwan Morgan Signs58Limerick Mariner31/10 17:45
Match Thread York H 136Lost in Lincoln31/10 17:06
3 o'clock kick-offs3TAGG31/10 16:09
Ex-GTFC players thread5,269It Bites31/10 15:09

This Season and previous Seasons